![]() For Burundi government, the court is funded by EU at 70%. According to her, the fact is that some world powers- the initiators of the project of the court’s creation urged other African countries to ratify the court’s statute using even pressure, while they did not do so to protect their potential criminals. The minister of justice repeated the government’s statement of the day before explaining the decision. ”Ī Court at the service of the great world powersĪimée Laurentine Kanyana: “Burundi says it’s time for African countries to withdraw from the Rome Statute establishing ICC” Burundi takes its responsibility as a nation to preserve its sovereignty and withdraw from the Rome Statute. ![]() Burundi believes it is time for African countries to withdraw from this statute. Since ICC was established, only nationals from African countries were brought before the Court as if the entire world were not concerned about the crimes perpetrated”.įor the minister, it is no secret that the initiation of investigations against the leaders of some countries is under the influence of great world powers, some of which have not even ratified the Rome Statute: “what calls into question the independence of the ICC prosecutor and the court itself. “ICC has become an instrument of pressure on the governments of poor countries or a way to destabilize them. The motivations of the bill were presented to the National Assembly by Justice Minister, Aimée Laurentine Kanyana. Two hours later, the text was adopted unanimously by the Senate, 37 votes to 37. On 12 October, the Lower Chamber of the Parliament voted by a huge majority the withdrawal of Burundi from the Rome Statute establishing the Our results suggest that insurance agreements that limit negative shocks and reduce noise, can encourage reconciliation by mitigating feelings of victimhood.MPs voted for the bill by a huge majorityĩ4 votes for, 2 against from André Ndayizamba and Fabien Baciryanino, both from UPRONA party and 14 abstentions, including that of Agathon Rwasa, the first vice president of the National Assembly. Finally, those with a lower victimhood bias are more likely to behave cooperatively in inter-ethnic relationships. Further, we observe that both inter-ethnic contact and economic development are associated with a decline in this victimhood bias. ![]() This “victimhood bias” wherein individuals ascribe noise to bias is much larger for (a) individuals for whom ethnic identity is salient (b) for those who have had greater exposure to inter-ethnic violence. We show that individuals systematically (and mistakenly) blame accidental negative shocks (noise) to the deliberate intent of individuals (bias). Using experimental data from post-genocide Rwanda and Burundi, this paper shows that an unwarranted tendency to blame others for negative outcomes is a behavioural barrier that makes reconciliation difficult. The difficulty in resurrecting inter-ethnic cooperation in the aftermath of violence and genocide is one of the biggest challenges facing post-conflict societies. DP17468 Mistaking Noise for Bias: Victimhood and Hutu-Tutsi Reconciliation in East Africa
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |